The Strategic Importance of Ukraine and the United States' Role in Europe
Last week's 28-point peace plan, proposed by Russia and the US, aimed to outline a potential end to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. However, it sparked uncertainty, especially among Europeans who were not directly involved in the negotiations. One of the central questions now is whether Europe can still rely on the rules-based system that has shaped its security for decades, with the United States as its protector, or if this has opened the door for further Russian destabilization of its immediate neighborhood and the rest of the continent.
At this year's Berlin Freedom Conference, Dalbacak World News spoke with retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, former commanding general of the United States Army Europe. He discussed why Washington needs Europe and why Ukraine's defeat would have negative consequences for the US as well.
Why Ukraine’s Victory Matters for the United States
Dalbacak World News asked General Hodges how Ukraine's eventual victory would be positive for the US. He explained that Europe is America's biggest trading partner, and American prosperity depends on European prosperity. European prosperity, in turn, depends on Europe's stability and security, which is being damaged by the war that Russia started. Therefore, winning this war against the Russian aggressor is crucial.
Additionally, if Russia is not stopped in Ukraine and this war continues into NATO territory, the US could find itself in an actual kinetic conflict with Russia. Deterring China also plays a big role: the Chinese are watching to see if the US is serious about sovereignty and international law, and whether it is a reliable partner.
Finally, Russia keeps Iran and North Korea going. If you're worried about these two countries, defeating Russia first leaves them further isolated, which reduces the damage they can do to Israel or South Korea.
Is the US Still a Reliable NATO Partner?
When asked about whether the US is still a reliable NATO partner, General Hodges said yes, but he expressed concern that people even ask this question because the Trump administration created doubt about whether the US would respond.
He noted that the perception of the US not wanting to do anything beyond issuing statements raises the risk of Russian interference. While the current administration has prioritized the western hemisphere, the Indo-Pacific region, and the Middle East, Europe is likely in fourth place in terms of priorities. This could lead to a reduction in US military presence in Europe, including in Romania and potentially Germany.
Military Presence in Germany and Air Bases
When asked about reductions in troops in Germany, General Hodges said it's almost inevitable. He pointed out that during Trump's first term, the number of US troops in Germany increased, but now there is more determination to reduce the presence. He mentioned that the US Army is shrinking overall, and some of that shrinkage will come from Europe.
Regarding air bases like Ramstein, he suggested that while reductions are possible, Ramstein is critical for operations in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. The bases that European allies allow the US to use are important for the US military.
F-35 Fighters and Potential Risks
The discussion then turned to Germany purchasing 35 F-35s from the US. General Hodges clarified that there is no such thing as a "kill switch" in these fighter jets. However, he acknowledged that the F-35 is a highly advanced aircraft with systems that make it unique. While the possibility of interference exists, he considered it extremely unlikely.
He added that the Trump administration would be reluctant to take actions that could damage business relationships or perceptions of reliability.
Germany's Arms Purchases and Transatlantic Relations
When asked about Germany buying around 80% of its weapons from Europe, General Hodges emphasized that arms purchases should be based on what gives the Bundeswehr the best capability. He noted that while Germany produces most of its weapons, there are areas where it relies on US systems, such as the Patriot missile system.
He also highlighted the importance of reducing vulnerabilities, such as reliance on Chinese-controlled rare earth materials.
Leadership in the US Defense Department
General Hodges shared his thoughts on Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, particularly after his speech criticizing "woke" policies and diversity within the military. He was relieved that senior officers responded professionally and respectfully, emphasizing their commitment to the Constitution over political figures.
He noted that while Hegseth has removed several generals without cause, the majority of senior officers are expected to carry out lawful orders. However, he warned that Hegseth's approach could discourage talented young women from considering military service.
Challenges and Concerns in Military Leadership
General Hodges pointed out that preventing bad or illegal orders from being issued is a critical responsibility. He stressed that while the process is difficult, it is essential for maintaining the integrity of the military.
He also raised concerns about the administration's approach to issues like the so-called Venezuelan drug boats and the president's comments about using American cities for training. Additionally, he criticized Hegseth's focus on male standards, which could negatively impact the inclusion of women in the military.
The Future of Military Leadership and Values
General Hodges concluded by emphasizing the importance of practicality in military leadership, noting that the US Army is 20% female due to the need for diverse brain power and the lack of enough men willing to serve. He warned that Hegseth's approach could deter talented young women from joining the military.
0 Response to "Washington Relies on Europe, Says Former US Army Europe General Ben Hodges"
Post a Comment